During an interview with former BlackRock advisor Edward Dowd, Robert Kennedy Jr. dove into how Pfizer played with the numbers during their trials to proclaim that their COVID shots were “100% effective” at preventing death via the virus.
Dowd mentioned that in the year-plus since the Pfizer jabs were released to the public, more and more information is coming to light that is displaying a pattern of cover-ups and manipulations enacted by Big Pharma to push through their shots – with the ramifications causing “real world” harms on people coaxed by the narrative.
“The fruits of their fraud are showing up in real-world results now, you and I have been aware of it for a while, but now unfortunately and tragically, it’s showing up in real-world data, insurance companies, and funeral homes. And this is a disaster.”
Much of these widespread perceptions of the COVID shots being ‘safe and effective’ were emboldened by studies where results were touted as being proof-positive that the shots were good to go.
Kennedy told Dowd of some of the number trickery employed to create various talking points, such as the shots being “100% effective”, describing an instance of data manipulation used between a placebo and a jab trial group bolstered the narrative of jab efficacy.
He explained that by Pfizer focusing on two deaths that occurred in the placebo group via COVID versus the singular death from the virus in the jab group, they could claim a 100% efficacy in preventing death with these shots.
“In the all-cause mortality data, there were 22,000 people who got the vaccine and roughly 22,000 who got the placebo. Of the 22,000 who got the vaccine, over the six-month…trial, one of them died from COVID. In the placebo group, two died from COVID. And that allowed Pfizer to claim that the vaccine was 100% effective against death because two is 100% of one. And that’s really all they got.
What it really means is you have to give 22,000 vaccines to prevent one COVID death, and if you’re gonna give 22,000 vaccines, you better make sure that the vaccines don’t kill anybody. Because if they kill one person, you canceled out any benefit.”
Meanwhile, as we recently reported here at Red Voice Media, Pfizer is reportedly trying to get FDA approval for another round of boosters shots for the elderly population.
Despite concerning reports of adverse effects caused by these shots in VAERS – with none other than Pfizer leading the pack in reported jab-related injuries – Pfizer and BioNTech are trying to get the FDA to hook them up with yet another emergency authorization to get more and more of these boosters injected into people ages 65 and older.
Not to mention the fact that the FDA already gave the green light for boosters for kids ages 12 and older.
Red Voice Media would like to make a point of clarification on why we do not refer to any shot related to COVID-19 as a “vaccine.” According to the CDC, the definition of a vaccine necessitates that said vaccine have a lasting effect of at least one year in preventing the contraction of the virus or disease it’s intended to fight. Because all of the COVID-19 shots thus far available have barely offered six months of protection, and even then not absolute, Red Voice Media has made the decision hereafter to no longer refer to the Pfizer, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson substances as vaccinations.
About the author
Opt-in to subscribe to new article notifications from this category.