“Patients were needlessly dying because government held policies for treating covid”.
This means, Covid patients were needlessly put on ventilators and were not given the correct medication etc (remember the suppression of Ivermectin, and this is why she says: “or go to the hospital and not make it out”). And here it says “were needlessly dying”, because e.g. of the reason that Covid patients failed to breath successfully, likely as a result of a Sars-induced *Polmunary Embolism, and not because of the common cold effect of the virus (*means: blood clots in the arteries of the lungs. But these symptoms with SARS-CoV-2 still remain generally suppressed in the media, particularly concerning blood clots), and thus cannot not be treated with a ventilator. In this example, only a blood clot dissolver can bring the patient back to breathing. And in such cases, putting Covid-victims on a ventilator, and especially also retracting Ivermectin, which is an anti-viral, and thus stops the formation of clots) makes things go worse, and people may certainly die. This is why she said: “everyone who died with Covid should be considered murder”, which she also reveals by saying that she treated Covid patients before going to the hospital and they got better, because of her pre-clinical treatment. It does not say here, in this particular sentence, it’s the vaccine, although lateron she also talks about the dangerous effects of the vaccine.
And why she said; “I’ve also seeing my colleagues being vaccinated and then get covid”? Well, this may have three possibilities, even four to be sure;
1) The vaccine is very dangerous, and cannot be denied, causing a terrible vaccine reaction or death, which is known to all of us. And, because the vaccine has a similar-like spike protein compared to the virus, a vaccine reaction may look, at least commonly, much like an infection with SARS-CoV-2.
2) But it may also be that people become symptomatic with Covid because of the jab, because the injection may make people primed, by what means, people may become more susceptible to an infection of the virus, where it usually remained asymptomatic, and this because the symptoms of the virus may now become apparent because of the injection. In other words, the vaccine may stimulate the effect of the virus.
And 3), this can also be because her colleages were previously infected with the virus, but the infection remained dormant, so asymptomatic, because of their still strong bodies and immune systems, but when now a vax is added, the immune system may fail whereby the formely dormant virus becomes symptomatic i.e. the effect of the vaccine may once again have a stimulating effect on the symptomatology of the virus.
Or 4) it may come altogether.
Conclusion: She does not really exclude the existence of the virus in her words and experience here, but predominantly lays weight on the vax, because the virus can be succesfully treated (with CORRECT medicines) whereas the vax is a much more difficult and dangerous case, if one may survive at all.
BOTH are very very dangerous, the virus and the jab.
About the author
Opt-in to subscribe to new article notifications from this category.